Fahrenheit 451 Vocabulary

The Buddha Is Staying On Indasala Cave - 3720 Words

The Buddha is staying in Indasala Cave. The sutta identifies the exact location of this cave on Mount Vediya, near a village called Ambasanda, east of Rajagaha, in the country of Magadha. I can do no better than to quote the description on the Buddhanet website: This remote and beautiful cave is the place where the Buddha delivered one of his most profound discourses, the Sakkapanha Sutta. He also uttered verses 206, 207 and 208 of the Dhammapada while staying here. Followers of Tibetan Buddhism will be interested to know that Buddhasrijnana, the famous commentator on the Guhyasamaja Tantra also once lived in this cave. The Indasala Cave is at the base of a sheer cliff halfway up the side of Giriyek Mountain†¦. There are two other things of interest in this area. At the end of the mountain you will notice a flight of stairs leading to a cave where an old swami lives. He doesn t speak English but he is a mellow old fellow and friendly to visitors. Further up on the very top of the mountain is the Hansa Stupa, the most complete still existing in India. It is a difficult climb through the thorn bushes but offers a fine view. Hiuen Tsiang visited this stupa and recorded the interesting story behind its construction. This sutta is another segue from sutta 18, in which Sakka and ultimately Sanatkumara, in the form of the young boy Pancasikha, presided over a council of the devas of the realm of the 33 gods. Sakka resolves to visit the Buddha and, discerning his location,

Also Infamously Known As The BTK Killer †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Questions: How Was Encase Linked With The BTK Case? Why Encase Was Preferred Over Other Tools? Answers: Introducation The process of systematically compiling, evaluating and recording data for detecting crimes and possibly averting them using state of the art software tools is called Computer forensics (Yasinsac et al., 2003). Law enforcement may resort to Computer Forensics in cases where digitally stored data are pivotal in the outcome of a case. Technological management advancements has helped in designing and developing tools that could be used to analyse the activities of a computer user and probe much deeper into it (Nelson et al., 2014). Digital crimes are increasing day by day, and so are their consequences which become dreadful and exorbitant in terms of the costs involved (Meyers and Rogers, 2004). Digital information in the form of emails, secondary storage devices, digital images, browsing activities or anything that is even remotely connected with computers could be termed as digital evidence. One of the major advantages of using Computer forensic tools is that it can be used to recover the information that has been deleted from a device (Yussof et al., 2011). Most users may be unaware of the fact that a deleted file, however old it may be, could be recovered. Experts can also probe deep into network connections and collect private data from the internet. Computer forensics has changed the way that crimes were being investigated few years ago when these tools where not in use (Britz 2009). The victims and the crime Four of the members of the Otero family were present at the time when Rader broke in to their property on a cold morning in 1974. He did an investigation of the family members and pulled out a gun to bind the husband and wife with the cords he had in his briefcase. Then he strangles both of them and waits coldly as they are asphyxiated to their death. He takes the son to the bedroom and covers his head with a hood, suffocating him. Finally, he moves on to the daughter of the family, Josephine. He takes her down to the basement, and hangs her from a pipe to see her slowly succumb to death (Gray 2010). Raders next victims were Kevin and Kathryn Bright who were siblings. Four months after the initial attacks, Rader breaks into the Brights home wearing a ski mask. He gags the brother and shoots him in the head twice. He ties up Kathryn and strangles her. As she struggles to break free, Rader stabs her in the stomach repeatedly, to see her to bleed and die. Rader continued his killing spree with Shirley Vian, a young mother of three. He enters the house in the pretence of having a talk with the kids and pulls out his gun once he is inside. He takes the kids to the bathroom and binds the mothers hands. He strangles the victim to her death. Though he planned to kill the kids he leaves hastily as the telephone Auditing. Next of Raders victim was Nancy Fox, a 25 year old jewellery store worker. She had been on his surveillance for over four months. He lies to her that he has a sexual dysfunction, and needs to bind and gag her for achieving gratification. She complies, but to her horror, Rader continues to strangle her with a nylon stocking. After a brief struggle, she drops dead to the floor. After a hiatus for around six years, Rader gives way again for his dangerous obsession to take over when he decides to kill his neighbour, Marine Hedge in 1985. He breaks into her house and strangles her. He carries her body to the church, takes photographs of the body in different poses and drops off the body on a dirt road. For his next victim, Vicki Wagerle, Rader donned the uniform a telephone repair man, and asked her to let him inside her house. Once inside, he pulls out his pistol and attempts to bind her. As she struggles, he ties her up with shoelaces and uses a stocking to gag her to death. His final victim was Dolores Davis, a 63 year old woman. He breaks into her house and tells her that he is a fugitive dodging the law. He continues to tie her down and suffocates her by gagging. This was the last reported murder of the BTK killer after which he became reclusive, till his reappearance in 2004. Rader later revealed that he derived sexual gratification from his murders and enjoyed seeing the struggle of his victims as they laboured hard for their last breath (LaBrode 2007). The evidences that were collected in this case were mainly a blind cord, a postcard addressed to the media, a couple of dolls simulating his murders and the disk from which his details were traced. Not only did the victims lose their lives, but Raders actions scarred the life of the survivors. Bill Wegerle, who remained the prime suspect for the murder of his wife Vicki before Radar was being caught, were one of the many people whose life was affected by the crimes Radar committed. Rader was trialled by the Kansas court and pleaded guilty for the murders he committed (Beaver and Kevin 2010). He was handed a minimum sentence of 175 years, without a chance for parole by Judge Gregory Waller. EnCase nabs Rader After contacting Landwehr, the officer in charge of the case, Rader sends a floppy disk with taunting messages and details about the murders. This disk was used by Computer Forensic Professionals, who used EnCase, a tool to retrieve information from a deleted file. It detected a user Dennis had made changes to the file. EnCase had given a solution to Raders identity by giving metadata about a file in the floppy disk. In this case, the tool helped in finding out information about a deleted file in the disk. On further investigation, the Police found out that Dennis was the congregation president of the Christ Lutheran church. In short, Encase is a tool for Computer Forensics investigation analysis. This Tool has various features like Evidencecollection, Deleted File Browsing Recovery, Live forensics, and Advanced Forensic Analysis EnCase and other forensic tools copy the data from a disk to an image file (Bunting and Wei 2006). Acquisition is the process of copying or accounting the data to the investigators hard disk. The process of data acquiring is called imaging. It copies every bit of information into the destination file. A sector by sector mirroring of the data is done which is termed as cloning. In certain cases, such as in image acquiring, EnCase helps in copying the image to a proprietary file. In this, a sector by sector copying is not done, but many sectors may be compressed into one. EnCase ensures validation of data by ensuring the integrity of the data that is being copied (Garfinkel 2010). As mentioned earlier, EnCase copies the data into an image file. Verification is done by comparing the image file with the original file that is being copied. The verification process in EnCase is done by generating a set of hash values that ensures the data is being verified correctly. Another important point in EnCase verification is that the tool does not verify with the original file but the image file that has been copied by the tool initially. Encase can retrieve most data in a file in its very original form. The recovery is made from a EWF file, which can be an image of a hard disk file or any other file (Ayers 2009). Using a keyword search, EnCase retrieves the file that has been removed. There are mainly two different kinds of searches in EnCase. They are raw keyword search which is done on allocated files or a physical search which is done on unallocated space in the disk (Garber 2001). A logical search examines the file without considering how the data is being stored while a physical search is done based on the memory location. Reporting, which is the last stage ensures the results are easily decipherable by the audience (Meyers and Rogers 2004). EnCase includes features such as a variety of reporting templates, formatting tools that can alter the layout of the reports and features to add notes and tags (Basset et al 2006). The reports in EnCase consists of bookmark folders, report templates and case information items all intended to present the report in an organized manner (Huebner et al 2007). During 2004, Randy Stone who was an ex Police Officer had a man asking him several questions about email security. The man turned out to be Rader himself. He wanted to know if a floppy disk was sent to the Police, could there be chances of his original identity be traced back. After months of contemplation, Rader finally sends the Police a floppy disk with his taunts, messages and details about the murders he had committed. The Police used the EnCase tool to retrieve a file called Test A.rtf, which turns out to be the crucial point in the 30 year old case. EnCase is a Forensic tool by Guidance Software, considered to be the golden standard in forensic cases. EnCase was used by almost all of the law enforcement teams during the time due to its reputation of being accurate and widely accepted as a valid evidence. EnCase identifies the username of the Computer which was used to create the text file and revealed a name called Dennis. It also revealed the name Wichitas Christ Lutheran Chu rch. An internet search by both the terms finally reveals the true identity of Dennis Rader who was the congregation president for the church. A DNA analysis finally confirms that Rader was the BTK killer himself. Thus the efficiency of a software tool like EnCase coupled with the perseverance of the Police finally helped in cracking one of the most horrific case of an elusive serial murderer. Since the primary evidence in the case was the floppy disk, it had to be made sure that a Forensic tool that was a standard and accepted by the legal fraternity had to be used (Chu 2005). If a non standard tool was used, there were risks of the evidence not being accepted. EnCase also had many distinct advantages over other contemporary forensic tools. Its ease of use, standardized forms of reports, acceptance as an authentic tool all were a few reasons why it was preferred for the BTK investigation (Gibson 2006).Compared to other contemporary Computer Forensic tools, EnCase had several distinct advantages. It has a comprehensive search customization capacity according to a wide range of requirements. EnCase also provides recovery tools based on DOS and LINUX. There is an active user group called the EnCase peer and experts which give solutions to different challenges that are faced by the users in the industry. The support comes along with the purchase of the EnCase tool. It was contradictory that an advanced technological tool like EnCase helped in capturing the person behind the killing spree of the BTK killer. References Ayers, D., 2009. A second generation computer forensic analysis system.digital investigation,6, pp.S34-S42. Bassett, R., Bass, L. and O'Brien, P., 2006. Computer forensics: An essential ingredient for cyber security.Journal of Information Science Technology,3(1). Beaver, K.M., 2010. The promises and pitfalls of forensic evidence in unsolved crimes.Criminology Public Policy, 9(2), pp. 405-410. Britz, M.T., 2009.Computer finance and Cyber Crime: An Introduction, 2/E. Pearson Education India. Bunting, S. and Wei, W., 2006.EnCase Computer Forensics: The Official EnCE: EnCase? Certified Examiner Study Guide. John Wiley Sons. Chu, J.E.F.F., 2005. Was the killer next door.Time Magazine, Sunday, pp.1034672-3. Douglas, J. And Dodd, J., 2008.Inside the mind of BTK: The true story behind the thirty-year hunt for the notorious Wichita serial killer. John Wiley Sons. Garber, L., 2001. Encase: A case study in computer-forensic technology.IEEE Computer Magazine January. Garfinkel, S.L., 2010. Digital forensics research: The next 10 years.digital investigation,7, pp.S64-S73. Gibson, D. C., 2006. BTK Strangler versus Wichita Police Department: The significance of serial murder media relations.Public Relations Review,32(1), pp.58-65. Gray, R. M., 2010.Psychopathy and will to power: Ted Bundy and Dennis Raderpp. Business. Wiley?Blackwell. Huebner, E., Bem, D. and Bem, O., 2007. Computer forensicspast, present and future.Information security Technical report, 8(2), LaBrode, R. T., 2007. Etiology of the psychopathic serial killer: An analysis of antisocial personality disorder, psychopathy, and serial killer personality and crime scene characteristics.Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention,7(2), p.151. Meyers, M. and Rogers, M., 2004. Computer forensics: The need for standardization and certification.International Journal of Digital Evidence,3(2), pp.1-11. Meyers, M. and Rogers, M., 2004. Computer forensics: The need for standardization and certification.International Journal of Digital Evidence,3(2), pp.1-11. Nelson, B., Phillips, A. and Steuart, C., 2014.Guide to computer forensics and investigations. Cengage Learning. Yasinsac, A., Erbacher, R. F., Marks, D. G., Pollitt, M. M. and Sommer, P.M., 2003. Computer forensics education. IEEE Security Privacy,99(4), pp. 15-23. Yusoff, Y., Ismail, R. and Hassan, Z., 2011. Common phases of computer forensics investigation models.International Journal of Computer Science Information Technology,3(3), pp.17-31.

The Character of Slim Essay Essay Example

The Character of Slim Essay Essay During the fresh Slim is respected and trusted by his fellow spread workers and even has Curley following his orders. Slim advises George and becomes George’s intimate. As he acts as George’s intimate he later becomes the moral supreme authority of the drama. he is the chief character who can acknowledge things from right and incorrect. Slim is a particular character because he speaks to everyone from Crooks to Candy and even Curley’s married woman. In the novel the thought of hierarchy is of import. as Slim is trusted by the whole spread he is the 1 who is at the top. this is shown in the novel with his authorization. However during the drama he is the character who represents the baronial spread worker. Slim represents a sympathetic influence in the otherwise hostile nature of mundane life on the spread. When the reader first meets Slim in the novel he is presented as being high in the hierarchy in the novel. Slim is presented as a respectable adult male which is why the other spread workers trust him. this accordingly leads him to going the adult male who George can confide in approximately Lennie. as Slim realizes that Lennie has the outlook of a kid. We will write a custom essay sample on The Character of Slim Essay specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Character of Slim Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Character of Slim Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This shows how Slim is presented as a adult male who is really wise which leads people to swearing him. This is shown when it says. â€Å"his tone was friendly. It invited assurance without demanding it. † This illustrates how people can swear because of Slim’s soft nature. The ranch workers are shown in to esteem because of the hierarchy and because he is the baronial spread worker when it says. â€Å"they precede him. † This shows his authorization within the spread as they respect him and because of his place in the hierarchy of the spread. As Slim is portion of the hierarchy of the spread he described as when traveling â€Å"with a stateliness merely achieved by royalty. † This is shown to stress his place within the spread hierarchy and this presents the thought that he is like the prince of the spread. As slim is skilled he is called a â€Å"Jerkline skinner† which shows he is really baronial. This gives the feeling that as he has great skille d and a great deepness of perceptual experience he about emanates unagitated and understanding. In the fresh Slim is shown to hold a personality which is really alone compared to the other workers on the spread. Slim is described as holding a â€Å"hatchet face† which is â€Å"ageless. † This gives the feeling that Slim has a sense of immortality around him. which is described as being extraordinary. This illustrates how Slender as he is ageless is about like a piece of furniture for the spread as he is high up in the hierarchy which farther enforces the fact that Slim is a baronial spread worker who is trusted by the work forces. Steinbeck uses slims â€Å"ageless† and â€Å"hatchet face† to use the usage of similes to demo the character of Slim. He employs similes when Steinbeck writes that Slim’s custodies are â€Å"delicate† and are â€Å"those of a temple terpsichorean. † Steinbeck uses similes to demo Slim’s elegance within the novel. which besides represents his character as a character who is able to state right fr om right from incorrect which is a accomplishment in itself. This is besides illustrates how he has great accomplishment with his custodies. Furthermore. Slim is a character who is â€Å"capable of killing a fly on the wheeler’s butt with a bull whip without touching the mule. † This shows how Slim is trusted among the workers ; this besides emphasizes how Slim is character who is really powerful but controlled. Steinbeck presents Slim in the novel as a character who is about like a father-figure for the other ranch workers. This is shown when Steinbeck wrote that Slim has a â€Å"understanding beyond idea. † This illustrates how Slim is the male parent figure as he is the wise adult male of the spread and is the individual who is besides really perceptive. This shows that his mensural manner of life gave great hope to the other ranch work forces and gave them inspiration and a friend who they could speak to. Steinbeck uses positive adverbs to demo his kindness towards Lennie and George. As Slim is wise and really clever he realizes that Lennie has a head of a kid. This is shown when he uses the adverbs â€Å"kindly† and â€Å"Gently. † This shows how he has a caring attitude towards them as George has about looked after Lennie his whole life. In this manner he is about sympathetic towards George because he realizes how much George has had to cover with because of Lennie. which is why Slim becomes the intimate of George. Steinbeck makes the character of Slim become the intimate of George. He uses this so Steinbeck can associate back to the original narrative of George and Lennie. This is shown when it said. â€Å"Slim neither encouraged nor discouraged him. He merely sat back quiet and receptive. † This illustrates how Slim gained the trust of George because of his soft nature and because he is the male parent figure. This shows how he is in touch with other ranchmen although harmonizing to the hierarchy he is much higher than them. this shows how he is a really baronial and wise adult male because he considers himself as one of the common work forces. So he is able to listen to them with their jobs like they are the same his. As Slim becomes the intimate of George. in the conversation with George he says that Lennie is â€Å"a nice fella† and that â€Å"He ain’t mean† This shows how Slim has a different attitude towards Lennie as if he is looking after him every bit good as George. This is why the reader becomes sympathetic because Slim is sympathetic towards Lennie which encourages the reader to go sympathetic. This creates a cardinal function for Slim because without Slim the reader would non hold been encouraged to go as sympathetic to Lennie. Slim is polar towards the intervention Crooks because he is one of the lone people in the spread to handle Crooks with the regard he deserves. This is shown when he says. â€Å"He’s enough good. † This illustrates how Slim is just and compassionate because it shows how he knows the difference between right and incorrect which shows how he is impartial. This is because during the 1930s it was normal for black people to be treated really severely because to many people they were still known as slaves. which is shown through the isolation in which crooks lives. This is farther enforced when Slim is the really first character to turn to Crooks by his existent name alternatively of the name â€Å"nigger† which is a black slave or â€Å"stable vaulting horse. † This shows how he treats him with more regard than the other charac ters do. This gives the feeling that Slim clearly seems to hold a scruples during the novel. this shows why work forces swear his judgement. Through this it gives the feeling that Slim could be the metaphorical voice of Steinbeck showing his positions on bias and the manner people are treated and how they should be treated. During the novel the pragmatism of Slim is shown when he acts like a leader and usher because the Canis familiaris has been shot. This is shown when he says â€Å"Take a shovel. † to Carlson. The usage of an imperative shows Slim’s commanding nature and authorization. Furthermore as he is commanding. he is besides a realist which is why he understands that the Canis familiaris needs to be shot for the better of the Canis familiaris. The short sentence structure creates an consequence because it shows Slim’s dominating nature. Slim has a really dominating nature which is why Slim is the moral supreme authority during the novel and which is why he knows that Candy’s Canis familiaris has to decease. This is shown when â€Å"Candy looked impotently at him. for Slim’s sentiments were jurisprudence. † This enforces the thought of Slim being the moral supreme authority because it shows how it is an emphasized thought which is strengthened by the fac t that it is a statement. In the novel Slim has a batch of power and different characters to his character. As he is sort to many characters. non many ranchmen know what he truly would make. This is shown when it says. â€Å"Nobody don’t know what Slim can make. † This illustrates how Slim does hold a bad side which known wants to acquire on the bad side with. This thought that no one’s what he can make implies that Slim is capable of great force. This is shown when he â€Å"drowned four of mutton quads right off. † This is because his â€Å"bitch† could non feed them which shows that he will merely make force if it is necessary and so for the better non the worse. this emphasizes his overpowering power Slim has. Slim’s place in the hierarchy is high because he is able to do Curley halt what he is making. This shows his assertiveness when he says. â€Å"you ballad offa me. † This implies that due to the hierarchy and Curley’s fright of Slim. he is prepared to make what Slim tells him to. However when Lennie is acquiring beaten up by Curley. it shows how Slim is really peaceable but at the same clip endangering and ever looking out for people who are non in the incorrect. This is shown when â€Å"Slim jumped up. † this shows how Slim is protective over Lenny which makes the reader feels sympathetic towards Lennie. On the other manus his aggression is shown when says. â€Å"get um myself. † This illustrates how Slim has a concealed strength. and about Acts of the Apostless like a baronial dark Equus caballus. When Curley’s married woman dies. the character of Slim reveals that he did care about Curley’s married woman which is why he is respectful and caring during her decease. This is shown when Slim tells Curley â€Å"stay here with your married woman. † Slim uses an imperative to demo how he knows that Curley needs to remain at that place for his ain benefit but for Lennie’s every bit good. But. as the state of affairs escalates Slim realizes that â€Å"we got ta get im. † As he takes control of the state of affairs he does non make because he wants to kill Lennie but because he wants them to travel easy on Lennie and non ache him. This is because Curley wants to. â€Å"strap him down and set him in a coop. † This illustrates how Slender attentions for Lennie and does non desire him to decease. When Lennie dies he has to move as a intimate where he goes to George and non the opposite manner unit of ammunition because he has to reassure him because otherwise he knows that George will be feeling really bad after. He uses his realistic expression on life to demo how in life that is a rough life. this is shown when he says. â€Å"A cat got to sometimes. † This illustrates how he has to maintain George unagitated and does this by the usage of repeat. which is shown when he says. â€Å"you hadda George. I swear you hadda. † He is acquiting George so that he feels better which is further implemented when Slim â€Å"twitched George’s cubitus. † So Slender utilizations positive encouragement to hearten up George. This is in contrast to when Slim had to hearten confect up for when they killed his Canis familiaris. it is like Lennie is George’s whelp and so Slim has to now hearten up George. While facing George about killing Lennie Slim says to him to sit down and so â€Å"sat down beside him. sat really near to him. † The repeat of the word â€Å"sat† shows how he Is once more utilizing the thought of repeat to quiet him as they are friends and Slim is the male parent figure for George. the manner George was for Lennie. This creates a physical propinquity which is created by the appeasement and repe at. The writer uses Darwin’s theory to show a subject to the reader that merely the strongest can last in the universe and the weak must decease. which is why Lennie must decease. This is because Lennie is like the ill whelp because it would be â€Å"cruel to maintain him alive† like Carlson said. Overall Slim is presented in â€Å"Of mice and men† as the male parent figure of the spread and so the leader to whom everyone respects and can speak to in times of demand. As he is the father figure of the spread he is really baronial and sees himself as one of the common workers. this is why he is the moral supreme authority during the drama who voices the sentiment of Steinbeck. As George neer truly had anyone talk to. Slim becomes the intimate for George assisting him through George’s heartache when he kills Lennie. Slim provides a polar function in the Novel because he is the character who is impartial and is one of the common work forces who is high in the hier archy.